From the Retrodelphia archive

Kent Coffey

Insignia 4-Piece Walnut Bedroom Set

c. 1960s

Size
42"H x 42"W x 19"D
Material
Brass, Walnut, Wood

This piece has found a home.

Looking for something similar?

Our inventory changes constantly. Tell us what caught your eye and we’ll keep it in mind while sourcing, or browse pieces currently available.

An exceptional example of American Mid-Century Modern craftsmanship! This stunning 4-piece walnut bedroom set by Kent Coffey is from the highly desirable Insignia collection, circa 1960s.Read moreRead less

An exceptional example of American Mid-Century Modern craftsmanship! This stunning 4-piece walnut bedroom set by Kent Coffey is from the highly desirable Insignia collection, circa 1960s. Featuring beautiful walnut wood grain, sleek architectural lines, sculpted bases, and elegant brass-tone hardware, this matching set perfectly captures the timeless sophistication of the era. Included are a spacious triple dresser, tall high chest, and two matching nightstands. The distinctive sculpted legs and rich walnut finish give each piece a striking modernist appearance. Offering generous storage while maintaining a refined, minimalist aesthetic, this complete bedroom suite is both functional and visually impressive. A fantastic opportunity to own an increasingly difficult-to-find matching vintage collection. Perfect for any Mid-Century Modern enthusiast or collector! (CHEST): 42” L x 19” W x 42” H (DRESSER): 74.25” L x 19” W x 31.5” H (NIGHTSTANDS): 24” L x 16.5” W x 25” H

Specifications

Dimensions: 42"H x 42"W x 19"D
Era / Period: 1960–1969
Maker: Kent Coffey
Materials: Brass, Walnut, Wood
Condition: Good
Category: Bedroom Set
How we attribute makers and designers

We research and identify designers and makers whenever surviving labels, construction details, or reliable documentation allow. On older furniture, labels and stamps may be missing, faded, or removed, and many manufacturers produced closely related designs; some pieces may be later reproductions. When the evidence is not strong enough for a confident attribution, we list the maker as unknown rather than speculate.