From the Retrodelphia archive

Arne Vodder

Mid-Century Danish Modern Round / Oval Teak Dining Table

c. 1960s

Size
29"H x 50.5"W x 50.5"D
Material
Teak, Wood

This piece has found a home.

Looking for something similar?

Our inventory changes constantly. Tell us what caught your eye and we’ll keep it in mind while sourcing, or browse pieces currently available.

Elevate your dining space with this handsome Mid-Century Danish Modern teak dining table, dating to the 1960s. Featuring a warm teak finish, beautiful natural wood grain, and a sculptural pedestal-style base, the table offers the clean lines and understated sophistication associated with classic Scandinavian design.Read moreRead less

Elevate your dining space with this handsome Mid-Century Danish Modern teak dining table, dating to the 1960s. Featuring a warm teak finish, beautiful natural wood grain, and a sculptural pedestal-style base, the table offers the clean lines and understated sophistication associated with classic Scandinavian design. Its rounded oval form creates an inviting setting while maintaining a streamlined modern profile. A single extension leaf expands the table to approximately 74 inches long, providing additional room for entertaining, holidays, or larger gatherings. When closed, it offers a more compact footprint for everyday dining. The rich teak tones pair beautifully with both vintage and contemporary interiors. A versatile statement piece for collectors, designers, or anyone looking to add authentic mid-century character to a dining room.

Specifications

Dimensions: 29"H x 50.5"W x 50.5"D
Style: Danish Modern
Era / Period: 1960–1969
Maker: Arne Vodder
Materials: Teak, Wood
Condition: Good
Category: Dining Table

Condition Notes:

Refinished.

How we attribute makers and designers

We research and identify designers and makers whenever surviving labels, construction details, or reliable documentation allow. On older furniture, labels and stamps may be missing, faded, or removed, and many manufacturers produced closely related designs; some pieces may be later reproductions. When the evidence is not strong enough for a confident attribution, we list the maker as unknown rather than speculate.