From the Retrodelphia archive

Mid-Century Danish Modern Teak Executive’s Desk – Refinished!

c. 1960s

Size
29.5"H x 65"W x 29.75"D
Material
Teak, Wood

This piece has found a home.

Looking for something similar?

Our inventory changes constantly. Tell us what caught your eye and we’ll keep it in mind while sourcing, or browse pieces currently available.

A handsome Mid-Century Danish Modern teak executive’s desk, circa 1960s, recently refinished to restore the richness and depth of the teak grain while preserving its clean Scandinavian character. The expansive desktop offers generous workspace, complemented by substantial storage with multiple drawers and a cabinet compartment.Read moreRead less

A handsome Mid-Century Danish Modern teak executive’s desk, circa 1960s, recently refinished to restore the richness and depth of the teak grain while preserving its clean Scandinavian character. The expansive desktop offers generous workspace, complemented by substantial storage with multiple drawers and a cabinet compartment. Sculpted recessed pulls, tapered legs, and the streamlined floating profile give the desk a refined architectural presence from every angle, making it ideal for executive offices or open-plan interiors. The paneled reverse allows the desk to sit confidently in the center of a room rather than against a wall. A sophisticated statement piece combining practical storage, strong proportions, and timeless Danish modern design for collectors, designers, and discerning workspaces.

Specifications

Dimensions: 29.5"H x 65"W x 29.75"D
Era / Period: 1960–1969
Maker: Unknown
Materials: Teak, Wood
Condition: Good
Category: Desk

Condition Notes:

Refinished.

How we attribute makers and designers

We research and identify designers and makers whenever surviving labels, construction details, or reliable documentation allow. On older furniture, labels and stamps may be missing, faded, or removed, and many manufacturers produced closely related designs; some pieces may be later reproductions. When the evidence is not strong enough for a confident attribution, we list the maker as unknown rather than speculate.