From the Retrodelphia archive

American of Martinsville

“Accord” Round Walnut Dining Table

c. 1960s

Size
30"H x 42.25"W x 42.25"D
Material
Walnut, Wood

This piece has found a home.

Looking for something similar?

Our inventory changes constantly. Tell us what caught your eye and we’ll keep it in mind while sourcing, or browse pieces currently available.

A striking example of American Mid-Century Modern design, this American of Martinsville “Accord” Round Walnut Dining Table dates to the 1960s. Crafted in richly figured walnut, the table showcases a beautifully grained circular top accented by distinctive contrasting inlaid details, adding a refined decorative touch to its clean silhouette.Read moreRead less

A striking example of American Mid-Century Modern design, this American of Martinsville “Accord” Round Walnut Dining Table dates to the 1960s. Crafted in richly figured walnut, the table showcases a beautifully grained circular top accented by distinctive contrasting inlaid details, adding a refined decorative touch to its clean silhouette. Slender tapered legs provide the elegant, sculptural profile associated with classic modernist furniture. The table includes two extension leaves, allowing it to expand to approximately 66.25 inches long, making it equally suitable for intimate everyday dining or larger gatherings. Its warm walnut tones and timeless proportions pair effortlessly with both vintage and contemporary seating. A collectible and versatile American design offering exceptional style, functionality, and enduring Mid-Century appeal.

Specifications

Dimensions: 30"H x 42.25"W x 42.25"D
Era / Period: 1960–1969
Materials: Walnut, Wood
Condition: Good
Category: Dining Table
How we attribute makers and designers

We research and identify designers and makers whenever surviving labels, construction details, or reliable documentation allow. On older furniture, labels and stamps may be missing, faded, or removed, and many manufacturers produced closely related designs; some pieces may be later reproductions. When the evidence is not strong enough for a confident attribution, we list the maker as unknown rather than speculate.